Monday, August 20, 2007

It's the cyandide compounds in seeded fruit that helps health

Some three to four decades ago the US FDA banned Laetrile. Laetrile is an anti-cancer compound found in the seed of pits from seeded fruit like plums, apricots, peaches, nectarines, etc., and almonds.

The offending compound, after the anti-cancer benefit, was the pit inside the seed of apricots used for this health benefit.

Almonds have a similar benefit to a lesser extent. The anthocyanidin compounds are also found in blueberries, blackberries, raspberries, strawberries, gooseberries and other similar type multi-seeded fruit.

Over the last five or more years the government has attempted to ban any natural supplement with these cyanide compounds. And, in its definition of wisdom, has a current plan to fumigate and / or irradiate almonds, making them a health risk from toxic sprays and radiation exposure.

This is not the first article to support the anti-cancer benefit of foods with proanthocyanidins.

You can decide why the FDA wants a ban on products containing these compounds.

Natural pigments that give certain fruit and vegetables a rich red, purple or blue colour act as powerful anti-cancer agents, according to a study by American scientists.

The compounds, found in foods such as aubergines, red cabbage, elderberries and bilberries, restricted the growth of cancer cells and in some cases killed them off entirely, leaving healthy cells unharmed.

The study combined laboratory tests on human cancer cells with experiments on animals that were designed to see whether a diet rich in the foods made a difference to their risk of developing cancer.

Foods with the highest levels of the compounds were most effective at slowing cancer growth, with exotic purple corn and chokeberries stopping the growth of colon cancer cells and killing 20% in lab tests. Foods less enriched with the pigments, such as radishes and black carrots, slowed the growth of colon cancer cells by 50% to 80%.

The findings bring scientists closer to unravelling the key ingredients responsible for giving fruit and vegetables their cancer-fighting properties.

Because the pigments, which belong to a class of antioxidant compounds known as anthocyanins, are not easily absorbed by the bloodstream, they travel through the stomach to the gastrointestinal tract, where they are taken up by surrounding tissues.

Their survival through to the lower part of the intestine may be the key to their role in preventing cancers in the tract, the scientists believe.

Researchers led by Monica Giusti, an expert in plant nutrients at Ohio State University, extracted anthocyanins from a variety of exotic and more common fruits and vegetables that all had a deep red, blue or purple hue and added them to flasks containing a suspension of human colon cancer cells.

When the team calculated how much of each extract was needed to reduce cancer cell growth by 50%, they found anthocyanin from purple corn to be the most potent. Chokeberries and bilberries were nearly as effective, while radish anthocyanin required nine times as much - or 131 micrograms per millilitre of cancer cell solution to cut cell growth by half.

In a second study, the researchers fed rats with colon cancer a diet of anthocyanin extracts from bilberries and chokeberries, which are most often used as flavourings in jams and fruit drinks. Colon tumours in the rats fell by 60% to 70% compared with a control group that were not given anthocyanin.

"These foods contain many compounds and we're just starting to figure out what they are and which ones provide the best health effects," said Dr Giusti.

"All fruits and vegetables that are rich in anthocyanins have compounds that can slow down the growth of colon cancer cells, whether in experiments in laboratory dishes or inside the body."

The research was presented yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston.

The team are now investigating whether it is possible to modify the structure of the pigment compounds to make them even more potent. Tentative results so far suggest that grafting an extra sugar or acid molecule to the anthocyanins improved their effectiveness.

The work is part of a long-term investigation aimed at a greater understanding of the 600 anthocyanins found in nature. "We're just beginning to scratch the surface of understanding how the body absorbs and uses these different structures," Dr Giusti said.

In June, market researchers reported that sales of anthocyanin-rich blueberries had doubled in the past two years. The berries joined a growing list of what associations marketing the products call "superfoods", alongside oily fish, brazil nuts and tomatoes. Anthocyanins have previously been linked to helping towards a healthy heart and with treating skin conditions.

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Stealth Watching People sort of...

Distributed Internet Measurements and Simulations
The DIMES headquarters are situated in Tel-Aviv University 's EE-Systems department.

Questionable Activities Perhaps

Ever wonder why DIMES HQ is located in Israel when it is an FDA cohort run by a tech named Brenda Cosby in Maryland. When it logs your blog, website, or other activity you wonder why and what they wish to know?

Number of Entries:3
Entry Page Time:16th August 2007 09:56:13
Visit Length:Multiple visits spread over more than one day
Browser:MSIE 6.0
OS: Windows 2000
Resolution: unknown
Returning Visits:
Location: Maryland, Gaithersburg, United States
Hostname:wallwhale-pub.fda.gov (150.148.0.27) [Label IP Address]
Entry Page:
Exit Page:
Referring URL: No referring link

Spying must be one of those bureaucratic activities engaged in to fill up the time available, under management-by-other-means protocols.

This is AKA "The Peter Principle".

Friday, August 17, 2007

Depression is 'over-diagnosed'

At least this physician is open enough to express the exact status of this issue today, as driven by the Big Pharma quest for profits.

"Over the last 30 years the formal definitions for defining clinical depression have expanded into the territory of normal depression, and the real risk is that the milder, more common experiences risk being pathologised."

An example of this is the development of new so-called conditions that are designed by drug companies in their drive to sell more drugs. Shyness has been turned into a mental condition. "Dysmorphic" dis-order applies to women for natural monthly cycle imbalances. Give an SSRI but don't address - or even attempt to discover - the root cause. In most cases the root cause is nutritionally based, an area where medicine has no basis of practice. The doctors don't want to learn about nutrition or more natural and safer approaches.

Another area that has anti-depressants thrown at it, instead of consoling care and counseling, is grief following the death of a loved one. Natural sadness from the loss is not depression, and a pill fails to meed the needs of the person experiencing this process. Elisabeth Kubler-Ross helped some of us learn this in the 60s.

To me it boils down to a scientific method I never learned in all the biology, chemistry, physics and physiology classes I excelled in in high school and college.

One never knows, just be aware.

Too many people are being diagnosed with depression when all they are is unhappy, a leading psychiatrist says.

Professor Gordon Parker claims the threshold for clinical depression is too low and risks treating normal emotional states as illness.

Writing in the British Medical Journal, he calls depression a "catch-all" diagnosis driven by clever marketing.

But another psychiatrist writing in the journal contradicts his views, praising the increased diagnosis of depression.

The milder, more common experiences risk being pathologised.

Professor Ian Hickie writes that an increased diagnosis and treatment of depression has led to a reduction in suicides and removal of the old stigma surrounding mental illness.

Under the current diagnosis guidelines, around one in five adults is thought to suffer depression during their lifetime. This costs the UK economy billions in lost productivity and treatment.

Professor Parker, from the University of New South Wales, in Australia, said the "over-diagnosis" began around 25 years ago.

Study of teachers

The professor, who carried out a 15-year study of 242 teachers, found that more than three-quarters of them met the current criteria for depression.

He writes in the BMJ that almost everyone had symptoms such as "feeling sad, blue or down in the dumps" at some point in their lives - but this was not the same as clinical depression which required treatment.

HAVE YOUR SAY

People get a bit fed up with life and think they have depression, but if they had actually suffered with depression they would know about it Mrs Jackman, Wirral, UK
He said prescribing medication may raise false hopes and might not be effective as there was nothing biologically wrong with the patient.

He said: "Over the last 30 years the formal definitions for defining clinical depression have expanded into the territory of normal depression, and the real risk is that the milder, more common experiences risk being pathologised."

But Professor Hickie said if only the most severe cases were treated, people would die unnecessarily.

Marjorie Wallace, chief executive of the mental health charity Sane, said: "Depression can be a complex and challenging condition ranging from feeling low to being so disabled that the person may be unable to get out of bed in the morning, sustain relationships or work.

"It is not surprising that with such a wide range of symptoms, identification varies from one doctor to another.

"Sane believes that it is better to risk over diagnosis than to leave depression untreated. One in ten people with severe depression may take their own life."

The number of prescriptions for antidepressants in England hit a record high of more than 31 million prescriptions earlier this year - a 6% rise in two years.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/6950733.stm
Published: 2007/08/17 04:13:39 GMT
© BBC MMVII

Monday, August 13, 2007

Can You Really Believe This?

My regular readers know what I have to say about lying with statistics. I guess you can fool people with hilarious headlines too. And remember the the courts have said it is ok to lie in the media...

This study is off, by well more than a mile, and here's why.

First of all the report gives no information about who provided the funding or the supplements. Remember that Pfizer's junque vitamin Centrum gets to tout all the marvelous benefits of viatmins. Because its Pfizer, a big campaign donor to the current administration, whose lobbyists get to participate in writing new drug legislation a when no one else can, also gets its vitamins paid for in the Senior drug payola to the drug companies program. If it was anyone else or some small company any claim is off limits without raising the ire of the FDA, strongly protecting the drug companies from the other side of the door.

Another important issue not reported in this study is that the amounts provided participants is extremely low in comparison to therapeutic dosing, or in what we refer to as orthomolecular medicine.

What the study failed to do was to provide the basic requirement of vitamin c for an adult. This happens to be 3000 mg a day because humans do not make their own vitamin C as do primates and other animals. This basic amount was determined through primate studies.

Therapeutic doses are substantially higher in many cases. Right now I am taking 12500 mg daily in five divided doses because it is harvest where I live and the dust is causing me to have unhappy lungs. With the vitamin C at this level I have no respiratory issues and this reduces stress on my heart. I too am in the age range of this study's participants. In addition I take non-soy vitamin E, 800 IU daily and a combination vitamin A / Beta Carotene tablet of 25,000 IU a day. Many people, including researchers, may not know that beta-carotene cannot convert to vitamin A alone.

"The women consumed either 500 milligrams of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) every day, 600 international units of vitamin E every other day, or 50 milligrams of beta carotene every other day."

In itself, the above reference to the study informs me that the outcome was to show vitamins do no good for health.

Don't be fooled, see more here from the experts.

And as far as getting enough vitamins in the diet is groundless because of corporate agricultural methods and food processing, all permitted by your government.
CHICAGO (Reuters) 13 August 07
Common vitamins no help for women's hearts: study -
Middle-aged women at risk for heart disease received little benefit from taking vitamins C, E or beta carotene, researchers said on Monday.

Though vitamin supplements provided no heart benefit, eating a diet rich in those vitamins does make for healthier heart, their study noted.

Experts believe a nutritious diet rich in these vitamins protect the body's cardiovascular system by counteracting compounds known as "free radicals." These harmful compounds build up in the body and can damage artery linings, encourage blood clots and alter the function of blood vessels.

"Single antioxidants (vitamins) may not reflect the complex vitamins and nutrients found in foods, which may explain the discrepancies between most intervention trials and studies of fruits and vegetables," wrote study author Nancy Cook of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston.

"While additional research into combinations of agents, particularly for stroke, may be of interest, widespread use of these individual agents for cardiovascular protection does not appear to be warranted," she concluded.

Among the more than 8,000 women, average age 61, involved in the study only a combination of vitamins C and E conferred a slightly lower risk of stroke compared to placebos.

The participants were tracked for roughly nine years for fatal heart disease, heart attacks, strokes and heart-related surgery, the study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine said. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the industrialized world.

"Do we expect these supplements to reverse 30 years of heart disease? Of course they won't," said Andrew Shao of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, a trade group for the industry that produces $20 billion in U.S. states annually.

"But studies show that supplementation with modest amounts of antioxidants over a long period of time, 10 years or more, (produces) modest benefits," he said. "They're subtle, as should be expected when you're talking about nutrients and not pharmaceuticals," or prescription drugs.

Importantly, the study showed taking the supplements did not harm the women, Shao said, as some recent research has suggested based on deaths from all causes.

The women consumed either 500 milligrams of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) every day, 600 international units of vitamin E every other day, or 50 milligrams of beta carotene every other day. Some consumed more than one.

Another FDA Funny

UPDATE:
I received a reply of sorts from the FDA along with a visit from the spyputer at FDAs DIMES HQ (ref: Elk Watching People). The reply was not from Dr. Galson to whom I wrote, but was an unsigned so-called response from an unnamed party at the FDA aka 'CDER'. The reply did not answer my query but danced around the issues in typical bureaucratic style.

I understand this because at one time in my career I worked with HHS and the USPHS, as well as the Washington state DSHS. Several years was enough to make clearly understand why integrity is so much a critical philosophy in my life.

If you would like to read a 2004 in depth article regarding statins from two key researchers, please see Dangers of Statin Drugs: What You Haven’t Been Told About Popular Cholesterol-Lowering Medicines

***

The FDA once again targets natural treatments while avoiding the ever increasing number of problems with their "approved" drugs.

What you don't read here is that RRY is the very statin that is the basis for the pharmaceutical industry's drug.

Statins are associated with rhabdomyolysis which can lead to very serious side effects, kidney failure and death. The statins have been associated with death yet remain on the market.

The statins also lead to cancer and Alzheimer's disease.

There is a prohibition of selling a substance that causes cancer, yet the FDA kow-tows to Big Pharma in deference to patients who can do as well or better with natural approaches to health problems.

And yes, there is a "cholesterol myth" but the FDA doesn't tell you about this either. The agency just waits for another BIG PAYOFF from Big Pharma to push yet another dangerous drug with little or no benefit, except taking your money...

Wonder why only Swanson and Sunburst Biorganics brands are being attacked when there are a number of companies selling RRY? I am waiting for this answer too, just as I wait for a prescribing physician to explain the risks of the statin drugs to their patients.
FDA Warns Against Use of Red Yeast Rice Supplements

ROCKVILLE, Md., Aug. 10 -- The FDA has warned consumers against using three brands of red yeast rice, a product marketed as a natural remedy for high cholesterol, because they may contain lovastatin, the active ingredient in Mevacor.

The products, marketed in stores or on the Web, are Red Yeast Rice and Red Yeast Rice/Policosonal Complex, sold by Swanson Healthcare Products, and manufactured by Nature's Value, and Kabco, respectively; and Cholestrix, sold by Sunburst Biorganics.

FDA investigators conducting routine testing of the supplement detected lovastatin, which was the first statin approved by the FDA. It has been available as a generic drug since 2002.

Steven Galson, M.D., M.P.H., director of FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said consumers may be unaware of side effects associated with lovastatin. These include rhabdomyolysis, especially when lovastatin is combined with the antidepressant nefazodone, certain antibiotics, drugs for fungal infections and HIV infections, and other cholesterol-lowering medications.

The FDA recommended that consumers who use any red yeast rice product obtain medical advice if they have muscle pain or other problems that may be associated with the red yeast.

The agency issued warning letters advising Swanson and Sunburst Biorganics to stop promoting and selling the products.

The FDA's warning letters said that the products Red Yeast Rice, Red Yeast Rice/Policosonal Complex, and Cholestrix represent unapproved new drugs that are marketed in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Saturday, August 11, 2007

More Folly

With flu season gearing up for another frivolus PR campaign, watch that trap that goes for the jab!

Bush Set To Veto To Remove Mercury From Infant Vaccines
Posted by: SAFE MINDS
on 07-20-2007.

"HHS-Labor-Education Appropriations Bill has objectionable provisions such as a measure to ban the use of childhood flu vaccines that contain thimerosal."

President Bush would veto the HHS-Labor-Education Appropriations Bill because of the cost and "objectionable provisions" such as a measure to ban the use of childhood flu vaccines that contain thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative.

Autism advocacy groups are outraged because President Bush stated in a questionnaire during his 2004 campaign: "I support the removal of Thimerosal from vaccines on the childhood national vaccine schedule. During a second term as President, I will continue to support increased funding to support a wide variety of research initiatives aimed at seeking definitive causes and/or triggers of autism. It is important to note that while there are many possible theories about causes or triggers of autism, no one material has been definitely included or excluded."

But since 2005, President Bush has steadfastly refused to issue an Executive Order banning high amounts of mercury in vaccines that would protect children and pregnant women despite repeated requests from the autism community that he uphold his campaign promise. Under his current administration, mercury has been and will continue to be knowingly injected into the youngest of American citizens. The controversial mercury-containing preservative thimerosal has been linked by thousands of parents as being the cause of their children's mercury poisoning and autism.

The flu vaccine which continues to be manufactured with mercury is recommended for all pregnant women, infants and children despite the fact that the Institute of Medicine in 2001 recommended against the policy of exposing these same sensitive groups to thimerosal containing vaccines. According to the EPA, one in every six women of childbearing age already has blood levels of mercury high enough to cause neurological damage to their unborn children due to environmental exposures alone.

"Injecting even more mercury into the bodies of pregnant women, infants and children when it is not a necessary component of vaccines is just bad medicine," said Lyn Redwood, president of SafeMinds and parent of a mercury-injured child. "It defies logic that a flu vaccine must be disposed of as a hazardous waste if it is not used, but somehow injecting the same mercury-containing vaccine into a baby is safe."

another thought might be the expense of hazardous waste disposal or maybe a connection with behavioral change and cellular (EMF/WI-FI) transmissions...
only the Shadow knows!

Friday, August 10, 2007

Dialing for Dinosaurs

Polls are interesting, usually because a predetermined result is expected based upon the way one writes the questions to be posed. I learned this in grad school when reading a required text titled "How to Lie With Statistics".

While I've always been skeptical of polls, based on my knowledge, this one isn't too bad.

Of course you would have to admit, if you read this blog regularly, I am a bit biased in favor of natural health care. My bias is because I know it works and I want all people to be able to have the option as their right of choice. Some will choose it, some will not.

Part of the problem lies with doctors who refuse to admit that non-medical treatment options offer hope and benefit.

Consider the Everett WA cardiologist in the Western Washington Medical Group who was exceptionally rude and disrespectful to a client of mine who was there for an evaluation of her condition.

I gave her a medicalarticle addressing the effective use of three supplements for heart conditions.

This doctor refused it and instead of looking at it and taking it for further reading, threw it back to her saying "I don't know anything about this, and it's not proven."

The same attitude prevails withe the cancer industry and the providers who adamantly adhere to false knowledge that supplements, nutritional, herbal and other treatments
do not work for cancer or interfere with the slash and burn techniques of chemo and radiation.

The best one I've hear came from a client taking chemo in a Lewiston, ID medical center. She was told not to eat broccoli because it would interfere with the chemo.

Now my take on that is that, yes, it interferes for the better because the brassica family of foods, of which broccoli is a member, is anti-cancerand so you would ultimately be able to get a better effect and possibly take fewer treatments.

For the 9.6% that stick with what they believe is 'proven', it might help them to know that it really isn't. The current methods are just what is used, and the real effective rate of cure is about 2%. It's the old rule, "we've always done it this way so we will keep doing it this way" mentality. After all, it is a cash cow first, and maybe a few might survive the damage. Survive the treatment's damage? Maybe that's good is you move on to a life on a lot of drugs to keep living in a compromised state.

What concerns me is the misunderstanding shown in the last section of questions. The majority of supplements are already proven to be safe and effective. The science is there. It's just that the consumer never hears about this body of knowledge.

And media outlets like MSNBC fail in their mission to give you the facts. Maybe Dan Abrams or Keith Olbermann will read this and call me to explain.

So, if 52% of those questioned would try something different, or 41% keep taking supplements it is a good thing. Then, I think the dinosaurs of the AMA and mainstream medicine should get going and read up on some of the proven studies, get a second opinion from me or take some of my classes.

Media pollsters can do the same.

52% Would Try Alternatives Over Chemo
MSNBC, 9 August, 07

Would you be willing to try alternative medicine for a serious health condition?
*3637 responses

Yes, I'd try an alternative therapy before undergoing something proven but unhealthy, such as chemo.
52%

I might supplement my doctor's suggested treatment with natural medicine.
33%

No. I'm sticking to what the medical community has found to be tried and true.
9.6%

I'm not sure.
5.3%

Do you take dietary supplements, including herbs and vitamins?
*8457 responses

Regularly
84%

Occasionally
8.8%

No
7.7%

Will the FDA's new manufacturing standards for supplements change your mind on the products?
* 8420 responses

Yes. At least now I'll know they contain what they promise and aren't contaminated with something scary.
45%

No. I already trust the supplements I take, so this won't make a difference to me.
41%

No. Makers of these products still don't have to prove they do any good. I'll keep steering clear.
6.3%

I'm not sure.
7.8%
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19371372/