Advertising and marketing pays, but is the price worth the cost?
Please see other posts in this blog on energy drinks via the search box and read my response to this latest celebrity campaign.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(617)
-
▼
October
(41)
- Insurance sales commissions raise eyebrows at Medi...
- Placebo Effect Benefits Health
- Hawking Retires
- Health Care and Elections
- Another Pink Charade Almost Over
- Should women who have paid for statins be given th...
- Green Living: Making Your Own Non-Toxic Cleaners
- Yes, Bisphenol-A is Toxic
- Tamiflu Resistance Confirmed
- Just a reminder - Exercise for Health
- CHF and Fracture
- LED v. CFL: We Vote for LED
- The real value of wellness programs
- Beware, genetically engineered and newer biologica...
- Its the Potassium
- Food Allergy on the Rise
- Natural Care: Very Scientific
- Milk Thistle
- Using your mind to heal
- Pfizer hedging its bets? UPDATE
- Requests for Information Regarding Sucralose
- Rash Report, not just CFL bulbs or Splenda: It is ...
- Stevia OK even if FDA holds out for synthesized forms
- Bone Health is not Helped with Soap or Fluoride
- Pets and Poison Protection
- More Vitamins Please
- Reducing Breast Cancer, Naturally
- UK Physician Speaks Against Pink October
- St. John's Wort treats major depression
- Flu deaths? Now really
- Cleaning Chemicals and Health
- Consider Acupuncture
- Highly promoted energy drinks and Lance Armstrong
- Avoid Mobile Use While Pregnant
- Mobile Phones and Mercury
- Monsanto Reprimanded for Trying to Take Over the W...
- Vitamin C and risk of coronary heart disease
- Cereal in a Box: UPDATED
- Bureaucratic bungling effects reservation women
- October Pink Promotions
- Vitamin C and Cancer
-
▼
October
(41)
Followers
Feedjit
Powered by Blogger.
No comments:
Post a Comment